Technology

X-Nav navigated implant surgery

Real-time computer navigation during implant placement — sub-millimeter precision against the surgical plan we built from your CBCT 3D imaging. Available at Suncoast in Goderich on cases where placement precision matters most.

Book an implant consultation
X-Nav navigated implant surgery setup at Suncoast Dental (placeholder)
Implant Options
What X-Nav is

Real-time GPS for implant placement

X-Nav is a dynamic navigation system used during implant surgery. Before the surgery, your CBCT 3D scan is loaded into the X-Nav system and we plan the exact position, angle, and depth of every implant against your specific anatomy. During the surgery itself, X-Nav tracks the position of the surgical drill in real time and shows the surgeon — on a screen, as the procedure happens — exactly how the drill is positioned against the planned implant trajectory.

Think of it as GPS for implant surgery: instead of relying on a static drilling template that doesn't adapt during the procedure (the way traditional surgical guides work), the surgeon sees the actual real-time position of the drill against the plan and can correct on the fly. The result is sub-millimeter accuracy on placement angle and depth — which matters enormously on complex cases like zygomatic and pterygoid implants, where being off by a few millimeters can mean the difference between a successful placement and one that doesn't engage the target bone.

Background on the system is available from X-Nav Technologies. At Suncoast, X-Nav navigation is used on cases where precision matters most — typically remote-anchorage cases, full-arch reconstructions, and any case where the implant geometry is complex enough that real-time feedback meaningfully changes the outcome.

Illustration of X-Nav navigated implant surgery — real-time drill tracking against CBCT plan (placeholder)
When X-Nav matters most

Cases where real-time navigation changes the outcome

Zygomatic implant placement — angle precision is critical for engaging the cheekbone
Pterygoid implant placement — the angled approach behind the upper jaw requires real-time guidance
Full-arch cases (All-on-4, All-on-X, teeth-in-a-day) — placement of multiple angled implants in a single visit
Anatomically complex cases — proximity to sinus, nerve, or other structures requires sub-millimeter accuracy
Cases where bone is limited — every millimeter of bone matters, and freehand placement leaves less margin for error
Combined with on-site general anesthesia for complex full-arch and remote-anchorage cases

X-Nav navigation vs. static guide vs. freehand

Three approaches to implant placement, each with different precision and use cases.

Feature X-Nav (Dynamic) Static Surgical Guide
Real-time feedback during drilling
Plan adjustment during surgery
Precision (typical) Sub-millimeter About 1mm
Best for routine single-tooth cases Not necessary Often used
Best for complex full-arch and remote anchorage Possible but harder
Requires special equipment Custom-printed guide

X-Nav navigation — frequently asked

Common questions about navigated implant surgery.

No. For routine single-tooth implants in well-positioned bone, X-Nav navigation usually isn't necessary — a static surgical guide is sufficient. We use X-Nav on complex cases where the placement geometry is challenging: full-arch restorations, remote-anchorage procedures (zygomatic, pterygoid), and cases where anatomical proximity to nerves, sinuses, or other structures demands sub-millimeter accuracy.
Slightly. The pre-surgical planning is more involved because the imaging and plan get loaded into the X-Nav system. The surgery itself isn't significantly longer — and on complex cases, X-Nav often makes the surgery faster by reducing the time spent confirming placement positions intra-operatively.
For routine cases, they perform about the same — both achieve roughly 1-millimeter precision. For complex cases, X-Nav has real advantages because it provides real-time feedback and allows the surgeon to adapt if the case unfolds differently than planned. For routine cases, static guides are usually sufficient and faster to set up.
There's typically a modest additional cost for X-Nav-navigated cases compared to static-guide cases, reflecting the more complex planning and equipment use. For straightforward cases where it doesn't change the outcome, we don't use it — we won't recommend it for cases where you wouldn't benefit.
On complex cases, yes — measurably. On routine cases, the difference is usually clinically insignificant. We recommend X-Nav specifically when case complexity (anatomy, bone quality, or implant geometry) makes the real-time guidance worth the additional planning effort.
Considering complex implant work?

Free implant consultation with case-specific recommendations

We'll review your case at a free consultation including CBCT imaging, and recommend the right combination of implant type, placement approach, and navigation method — including whether X-Nav makes sense for your specific situation.

Book Call Emergency